Mark Caserta: Letter to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture regarding lowering beef prices for Americans.

12 Apr

Brooke L. Rollins

Secretary of Agriculture

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, DC 20250

PROPOSAL FOR LOWERING U.S. BEEF PRICES WHILE ENSURING FOOD SAFETY AND PROTECTING AMERICAN FARMERS.  12.5.2025

Several drought years and other factors have caused beef prices to be at an all-time high.

Based on research, below are some options for increasing beef supplies, lowering costs, ensuring food safety and protecting our U.S. farmers which will require legislative action and partnership.

Support drought-recovery programs

  • Government feed subsidies or drought-relief grants help ranchers rebuild herds more quickly.

Incentivize faster herd rebuilding

  • Temporary tax credits or low-interest loans give ranchers capital to expand herds sooner.

Expand processing capacity

  • Many ranchers have cattle ready, but not enough USDA-approved processing plants exist.
  • More regional plants = more supply on the market = lower prices.

Reduce Costs for Farmers & Ranchers

  • When ranchers face high costs, retail beef prices stay high.
  •  Lower feed costs.  Feed is the single biggest expense.
  • Temporary feed-grain import relief (corn/soy)
  • Targeted subsidies for feed during drought years

Fuel & transport cost relief

  • Diesel costs heavily affect cattle transport.
  • A short-term fuel tax reduction or livestock transportation credit would lower costs fast.

Strengthen Competition in Meat Packing

  • Four meatpacking companies control over 80% of U.S. beef processing.

Let’s increase competition:

  1. Give ranchers higher prices for cattle
  1. Lower consumer prices for beef
  2. Reduce market manipulation

Short-term actions:

  • Enforce existing antitrust rules
  • Prevent anti-competitive contracts
  • Encourage new, small USDA-certified processors with grants

Encourage Domestic Production Over Imports

  • This protects farmers AND stabilizes U.S. supply.

Reinstate Mandatory COOL (Country of Origin Labeling)

  • When consumers know beef is U.S.-raised, ranchers get fair prices.

Close loopholes allowing foreign beef to be labeled “Product of USA”

  • Currently, beef shipped to the U.S. and cut or repackaged here can legally say “USA.”

Fixing this:

  1. Helps U.S. farmers
  2. Builds consumer trust
  3. Stabilizes domestic production


Improve Cattle Health & Reduce Losses

Faster, cheaper ways:

  • Increase USDA funding for veterinary services
  • Improve vaccine access
  • Support for digital livestock tracking to catch disease faster

Lower mortality and better weight gain = lower prices at the store.

Expand Direct-to-Consumer Beef Sales

  • This cuts out the middleman and dramatically lowers consumer prices.

Actions:

  1. Help small farms sell locally
  • Fund mobile USDA-certified slaughter units
  • Reduce regulatory barriers to farm-to-table markets. This produces immediate price relief for local communities.

Strengthen Food Safety Without Burdening Farmers

  • Some farmers face high regulatory costs that could be streamlined.
  • Without weakening safety, the U.S. could:
  1. Simplify inspection paperwork
  2. Expand digital inspections
  3. Provide grants for safety-compliance technology

Less overhead = lower producer cost = lower beef prices.

Fastest options for quickest result to achieve overall goals

  1. More processing capacity (unclogs the system immediately)
  2. Feed cost reduction
  3. Fuel/transport credits
  4. Strengthening competition in meatpacking
  5. Reinstating COOL to protect U.S. farmers
  6. Direct-to-consumer sales expansion

Mark Caserta

Huntington, WV

304-444-7216

Candidate for WV House of Delegates District 28

Mark Caserta: Candidate for West Virginia House of Delegates – Wayne County, District 28

10 Apr

It’s time for some common-sense representation and proven leadership!

Mark Caserta: Adding more laws won’t deter gun violence.

7 Apr

Mark Caserta is a candidate for the West Virginia House of Delegates in Wayne County

Here is a reprise of a column I wrote during Barack Hussein Obama’s administration in 2013 – little has changed. However, it highlights my position on the Second Amendment.

————————————

The threat to our homeland from domestic Islamic terrorism has never been greater in the history of the United States. 

The seemingly unimpeded march of radical Islam toward the West has indeed emboldened those who have sought to broaden their coercion of a caliphate, or a state governed in accordance with Sharia Law.

America reportedly now has ISIS members who have penetrated our borders and are actively recruiting domestic terrorists for attacks within the U.S. FBI Director James Comey has been traveling the country warning the terror group is now recruiting in all 50 states and Americans must be on alert.

“Those people exist in every state. I have homegrown violent extremist investigations in every single state”, Comey said to an ABC News team, describing their network as a “chaotic spider web.”

 In addition to the increasing threat of domestic Islamic terrorism, our nation continues to witness senseless murders by psychopaths on school campuses, in churches and in the streets. From Columbine, to Aurora, to Blacksburgthe list disturbingly lengthens.

So, given the fact that American lives have arguably never been more at risk, why would President Obama ostensibly seek to disarm not only America but Americans?

Last week, in the wake of the latest mass murder in Oregon, Obama unashamedly politicized the massacre while taking aim at the National Rifle Association for blocking gun reform. Obama said it wasn’t enough to offer prayers after major shootings which continue to occur regularly throughout the country.

“As I said just a few months ago, and I said just a few months before that, and I said each time we see one of these mass shootings, our thoughts and prayers are not enough,” Obama told reporters after the latest shooting at the community college in which 10 people were killed and another 7 injured.

He challenged Americans to hold their elected official accountable for acting on the issue.

So, Mr. President, since criminals by nature ignore the law, what sort of new gun law would have prevented this latest tragic attack?

While it may be cliche, when you take guns from law-abiding citizens, only the criminals will have guns. 

How do you explain your home city of Chicago, which has some of the nation’s toughest gun laws, having such rampant gun violence? 

According to the Center for Disease Control, Chicago ranks among the highest in metropolitan areas for gun violence!

 New gun laws will not deter criminals. We should focus on the training and education of law-abiding citizens in properly defending themselves from those who ignore the law.  Additionally, focus on mental health and returning hope to individuals who succumb to depression and resort to desperate acts to fulfill an obvious void in their lives.

When I obtained my concealed-carry permit, I was required to complete a hands-on course with a qualified instructor. And only those ignorant of what this training involves would paint a scenario replete with wanton vigilante “blasting” where innocent lives are even more at risk.

So, here’s another cliche ending for liberal Democrats:

Guns don’t kill people; people kill people.

Let’s focus on real solutions and not political grandstanding for a vote,

Mark Caserta: Get informed before voting – Here’s how!

3 Apr

https://www.ballotready.org/

Mark Caserta: Time for common sense on birthright citizenship

1 Apr
———-

Regarding Birthright Citizenship:

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 with a very specific purpose—to ensure that formerly enslaved people and their children were recognized as full citizens of the United States, and to permanently overturn the disastrous Dred Scott decision.

Today, however, we’re being told that this same amendment should apply to anyone in the world—regardless of legal status—who enters our country and has a child here.

Let’s be clear: that means any of the 8 billion people worldwide could come across our border, have a baby, and that child would automatically be granted U.S. citizenship.

This isn’t just a theory—it’s already happening. There are reportedly hundreds of “birth tourism” companies, including over 500 in China alone, that specialize in arranging travel for pregnant women to give birth in the United States for the purpose of securing citizenship for their children.

This raises serious questions about fairness, the intent of our Constitution, and whether current policies truly serve the American people.

This is a perfect example of my campaign theme, “It’s time for some common-sense”.

Here is the bottom line from a common-sense perspective:

Democrats have so dramatically lost a reliable voter base, they must bring viable illegal voters across the border to vote for the liberal hands that feed them, as well as encourage a long-term plan to “birth” additional voters for the future of their party. They are truly in a fight for their survival!

In our Republic, only the voters can stop the madness. I need your vote in the Primary, May 12th, please, along with your support of every true conservative GOP candidate.

Let’s do this.

Mark Caserta: Congress should not get paid during a government shutdown.

27 Mar

With no retroactive pay once reopened!

Regarding Congress using government shutdowns as a political weapon—holding America hostage and creating hardship for innocent citizens just to force one side to cave for votes—

The American people have had enough.

Given opportunity, I would support a constitutional amendment allowing the withholding of pay from members of Congress whenever the U.S. government is shut down and for the full duration of that shutdown.

The Twenty-Seventh Amendment, while well-intentioned, has become outdated in light of the repeated failure of elected officials to fulfill their most basic responsibility: keeping the government functioning.

If the American people must bear the consequences of a government shutdown, members of Congress should share in that burden.

I would also support removing the ability of members of Congress to vote to increase their own salaries. Decisions regarding congressional pay should be determined by an independent process, not by those who directly benefit from it.

Mark Caserta – Candidate for West Virginia House of Delegates – Wayne County D-28

http://www.markcasertawv.com

Mark Caserta: Democrats are working to see America fail.

7 Mar

Simply because they hate President Trump

Look around you.

Take an honest look at the direction our country is being pushed and ask yourself what it means for your children—and your grandchildren.

The liberal left is working diligently to desensitize our youth to destructive behaviors. And too many politicians are legitimizing their efforts by providing them means and opportunity – they already have motive.

Are you comfortable being represented by leaders who support policies such as these?

• Allowing biological men to enter women’s locker rooms and private spaces, compromising the safety and dignity of our daughters.

* Male Drag Queens being allowed to perform in front of our children or read transgender books to them in public venues.

• Using taxpayer dollars to support individuals who enter our country illegally and commit serious crimes against American citizens.

• Spending American tax dollars on questionable international programs while many needs at home remain unmet.

• Allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports, undermining decades of hard-fought opportunities for female athletes.

• Redefining long-standing biological realities and requiring employees to undergo ideological training to conform to evolving language and pronoun standards.

• Promoting political philosophies rooted in socialism that conflict with the principles upon which our nation was founded.

• Tolerating or excusing hostility and intimidation toward those who simply hold different viewpoints.

• Putting partisan political battles ahead of the safety, prosperity, and unity of the American people.

• Supporting abortion policies that fail to recognize the value and dignity of unborn human life.

• Pursuing energy policies that drive up costs for hardworking Americans while weakening our energy independence.

• Removing faith and moral foundations that have historically guided our communities and public life.

These are not abstract debates. These policies affect our families, our communities, and the future of our nation.

America was built on common sense, personal responsibility, respect for life, faith, freedom, and the rule of law. When those principles are ignored, the character of our country begins to change.

I believe the people of our district deserve representation grounded in those founding principles—not radical experimentation.

It is time to stop the insanity and restore common sense leadership, respect for our values, and a commitment to the future of our children.

Get informed, pray and vote to protect our future.

http://www.markcasertawv.com

Mark Caserta: President Trump shows leadership with attack on Iranian military capability; not only for U.S. but for Israel.

1 Mar

And he was well within his power as commander-in-chief to do so.

Let’s cut through the emotional responses from those more focused on President Trump’s shortcomings versus his successes, which is unfortunate. Despite presidents and legislators espousing for decades that Iran must not become a nuclear power and that we must protect our ally, Israel, President Trump showed leadership in making it happen.

And while the Iranian people celebrate, Democrat politicians choose, once again, to posture politically against Donald Trump rather than be intellectually honest regarding his brave initiative. Some even choose to refer to our military successes as “failures”.

They obviously have a different definition of winning for Americans.

Let’s look at it in it’s true light.

Situation: 

  • Iran openly states “death to America” and “death to Israel”
  • U.S.  State Department named Iran as the “top” state sponsor of terrorism in the world.
  • Since Oct 17, 2023, Iran-backed militias carried out more than 200 attacks on U.S. (and allied) targets in Iraq and Syria (CFR summary)
  • The first round of negotiations with Iran attempting to stop nuclear proliferation began April 12, 2025.  They consistently failed.
  • Iran insists on becoming a nuclear power and would surely use nuclear warheads without discretion.
  • Iran has recently murdered thousands of its own people because they demonstrated against the regime.

Article II, Section 2 — Commander-in-Chief Clause

This is the key provision:

“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States…”

This gives the President operational control of the military. From this, flows the authority to:

  • Direct military forces
  • Respond to attacks
  • Defend the nation from imminent threats
  • Constitutional scholars generally agree:
  • If credible intelligence shows an imminent attack, the President has authority under Article II to act defensively without waiting for Congress to formally declare war.
  • Factor 1: Long-term or sustained military campaigns typically require congressional authorization.  This conflict is currently 2 days.
  • Factor 2: Congress currently has less than a 17% approval rating per the Gallup Organization.
  • Factor 3: Approximately 49 percent of Congress are Democrat and have displayed time and again the willingness to sacrifice America’s safety simply to see President Trump fail.
  • Factor 4: It makes no sense to wait to an initial strike from Iran.  That’s the same as waiting for a mass murderer compiling guns and ammunition, to take the first shot.
  • Factor 5:  For decades, presidents and legislators, alike, have agreed Iran must not obtain nuclear capabilities and that the U.S. must support Israel.

Bottom line:  Given President Trump’s access to intelligence and the aforementioned information, we must fully support his decision to move without authorization from a congressional body comprised of a large portion unable to separate hatred and ideology from representation of their constituents.

I trust this president based on his record of putting America first – period.

Mark Caserta: A clear choice before us in the November mid-term elections – Obstruction or Representation

28 Feb

Let me be clear: the upcoming elections — including the November midterms — present a defining choice for our nation.

When political opposition moves beyond policy disagreement and becomes rooted in obstruction, distortion, and ideological hostility toward a sitting president, the American people must take notice. At some point, this ceases to be about party preference and becomes about principle.

During the president’s recent address to Congress, Americans were given a rare and revealing moment. President Trump issued a simple invitation:

“The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.”

He asked members of Congress to stand if they agreed with that fundamental premise.

What followed was not a procedural maneuver. It was a statement. In full view of the country, almost all Democrats chose to remain seated. 

That moment was not about theatrics. It was about priorities. The moment was revealing for Americans.

We live in a constitutional republic. We elect representatives to safeguard the interests of their constituents and uphold the rule of law. The oath of office is not symbolic — it is solemn:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

That oath binds members of Congress to the Constitution and to the citizens they serve — not to party loyalty, not to personal ambition, and not to ideological movements.

When elected officials appear unwilling to affirm that protecting American citizens is the government’s first duty, voters are right to question whether representation has been replaced by resistance and to vote accordingly.

This is not an isolated incident. Across issue after issue — border security, crime, national sovereignty, and foreign policy — Democrats have positioned themselves in reflexive opposition to President Trump, even when the policies in question align with the safety and prosperity of the American people.

President Trump has made no apologies for placing American interests first. Whether one agrees with every method or not, his central premise has been clear: government should work for its citizens.

The question before voters now is equally clear: Who will strengthen that mission, and who will obstruct it?  Democrats have chosen to obstruct it.

If we believe in a government that protects its people, enforces its laws, and prioritizes national strength, then we cannot be passive observers in this midterm election.

Analysts may say the odds are difficult. But as Scripture reminds us in Romans 8:31, “If God is for us, who can be against us?”

Faith, however, is not passive. It requires action.

Pray – Vote – Engage – Encourage others to participate.

If you are an independent voter and wish to have a voice in a primary election, consider your options carefully. Do not allow labels to silence your influence.

The future of this republic depends not on outrage, but on participation.

If our elected officials fail to represent the will and security of the American people, then it is our responsibility — peacefully, lawfully, and constitutionally — to replace them.

The time is now.

Mark Caserta: Democrats must “stand up” for the SAVE Act

25 Feb
Legendary actor Jimmy Stewart filibusters on the Senate floor in the classic movie, “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington”

Regarding the SAVE Act — legislation that would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections — this is a straightforward, common-sense safeguard.

Under the bill, acceptable documents would include a U.S. passport, a birth certificate, or other federal or state-issued identification verifying citizenship status.

Nearly every important area of our lives requires some form of identification. We show ID to board a plane, open a bank account, or even enter certain buildings. The opportunity to vote — one of the most sacred rights in our republic — should be no different.

Protecting the integrity of our elections is not partisan. It is foundational. A free and fair electoral system depends on the confidence of the American people. That confidence must be earned and protected.

If Senate Democrats oppose the SAVE Act, they have the right to do so. But they should be required to stand on the floor and explain their opposition through a real, “talking” filibuster — holding the floor and debating continuously, as the Senate was originally designed to operate.

That is not changing the rules. That is honoring them.

Think of it as “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” — open debate, transparency, and accountability before the American people.

We must act now to ensure voter identification requirements are clear, consistent, and enforced. The integrity of our republic depends on it.