Archive | FREE STATE PATRIOT RSS feed for this section

Mark Caserta: America is Starving for Leadership

28 Sep

America is starving for something that should never have become unusual: leaders willing to pray, think clearly, exercise common sense and remember exactly whom they were elected to represent.

We don’t elect leaders to represent a political party or an ideology!

They are elected to represent “We the People”.

Yet increasingly, Americans are watching elected officials approach some of the most serious issues facing our country as though the first question is not, “What is right for my constituents?” but rather, “Which side is the other party on?” or “Is this a Donald Trump policy?”

That is not leadership. It’s gut-wrenching politics and sadly, the reason many people refuse to vote.

 I’ve come to believe that some political figures have become selfishly satisfied that more Americans don’t exercise their right to vote for fear if they did, they would be fired!

 Americans deserve better.  The problem, however, seems to be the same ineffective politicians keep getting elected and feel absolutely no indebtedness or responsibility to their constituency!

Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, virtually every major issue—from immigration and crime to drug trafficking, parental rights and enforcement of federal immigration law—has once again become part of an intense partisan struggle, with the American people suffering the consequences.

Consider what is happening at sea.

The Trump administration has used military force against vessels it says are connected to drug-trafficking organizations that it has designated as terrorist groups. Some Democratic lawmakers, human-rights organizations and a couple Republicans have challenged the legality of those strikes and questioned whether the administration has sufficiently demonstrated that every targeted vessel warranted lethal military force. The administration argues that drug cartels represent a grave national-security threat.

That is a legitimate debate for Congress to have. But Americans also have every right to ask their representatives a fundamental question of “what’s in their best interest?”  Each of us has, no doubt, lost a family member or friend to drugs and it’s gotten increasingly worse due to feckless politicians lacking leadership in addressing the issue.  All the while our people are dying.

This administration, while not without fault, has actually worked to prevent deadly narcotics and violent criminal organizations from harming American families?  Yet, every step President Trump takes to protect Americans is automatically deemed dangerous by the left, regardless of its effectiveness. 

Are these representatives representing their constituents or their party?  It seems, at times, that a vote is worth more than a human life.

We certainly see this in the illegal immigration debate.  While the Trump administration has done what no other president has been willing to do in securing our borders, liberal Democrats seem to choose a vote over a life.

The names Laken Riley, Rachel Morin and Jocelyn Nungaray have been reduced to political talking points. They were beautiful human beings wonderfully created in God’s Image and deserve better.

Laken Riley was murdered in Georgia by Jose Ibarra, a Venezuelan national who had entered the United States illegally; he was convicted and sentenced to life without parole. Rachel Morin, a Maryland mother of five, was raped and murdered by Victor Martinez-Hernandez, who had unlawfully entered the United States multiple times; he was convicted in 2025. Two Venezuelan nationals who had entered the country illegally were charged in the killing of 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray in Houston.

Those cases do not establish that immigrants generally are criminals, and that accusation from the left is frankly, insulting.  We are a nation of immigrants who were welcome to come to America legally and assimilate into our culture of freedom.

Yet, Democrats choose every avenue possible to allow illegals to stay in our country simply for election leverage at the polls by establishing a consistent, dependent voter base. 

Based on recent polling 81% favor requiring voter ID — backed by 79% of independents and 70% of Democrats.

Yet virtually every Democrat in Congress voted against the Save America Act!  How can one justify this vote if a representative’s role is to vote on behalf of their constituents?  It is a stain on our republic.

The debate over commercial driver’s licenses has also moved beyond representation. In February 2026, the U.S. Department of Transportation finalized tighter rules governing certain non-domiciled commercial drivers, arguing that deficiencies in screening and access to foreign driving records created safety concerns.

Again, Americans should be entitled to representation that places public safety first!  They don’t need representation that protects a politician’s voter base.  Dozens of lives in several states have been lost due to illegal immigrants truck drivers.  Where’s the common sense?  Where’s the representation?

Then there is the continuing national argument over children, parents and gender policy.

On December 17, 2025, the House passed H.R. 3492, the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, by a vote of 216–211. The legislation concerned medical gender-transition procedures involving minors.

More recently, on May 20, 2026, the House passed H.R. 2616, the PROTECT Kids Act, 217–198. The measure requires certain federally funded elementary and middle schools to obtain parental consent before changing a minor student’s gender markers, pronouns, preferred name or sex-based accommodations. The vote included 208 Republicans and eight Democrats in favor, while 198 Democrats voted against it.

Common sense voters simply see these as protections for children and parental authority.

Yet, the Democrats leverage this as a political talking point directed at garnering favor among the LGTBQ voter, regardless of the proven detriment to our children, our families and our communities.

These a only a handful of issues weighing against the American people.

I’ve often stated that most politicians have forgotten their sole job is to represent their constituents.  They stick their finger in the wind and spew whatever rhetoric will purchase them the most votes – and then they go to work representing their own ideology or political party.

It’s become quite sickening, actually.  Equally concerning is the fact they KEEP GETTING ELECTED! 

We must stop allowing politicians to tell you what they believe. Look at what they do.

  • Read the bill.
  • Read the roll call.
  • Examine the policy.
  • Ask who benefits.
  • Ask who bears the consequences.

And then hold every elected official—Republican, Democrat or Independent—to precisely the same standard.

Our republic cannot function properly when allegiance to a political party becomes more important than allegiance to truth. Nor can it survive indefinitely when every issue is reduced to personalities.

Donald Trump will not be president forever.

Members of Congress will come and go.

Political parties will rise and fall.

But the principles upon which this nation depends—equal justice, individual liberty, responsibility, the rule of law, protection of innocent life and government accountable to the people—must endure beyond every election cycle.

For people of faith, there is another dimension. Our founders understood that liberty cannot survive without virtue and that self-government requires people capable of governing themselves. It requires wisdom, discernment, courage and prayer.

But even all of that is useless unless Christians exercise their right and I submit, responsibility, to vote!

America does not need politicians who automatically oppose something because Donald Trump supports it—or even automatically support something merely because he proposes it.

America needs leaders. Leaders who remember that the words written at the beginning of our Constitution are not We the Republicans or We the Democrats.

They are, “We the People.”

Perhaps the question Americans should be asking their representatives today should be a little different. 

Rather than ask questions about the politicians; perhaps we should begin asking questions about ourselves.  Don’t complain about what you permit. 

We hire our representatives with our vote. Just as in business, we should monitor their work ethic and effectiveness.  And we decide if they should stay in office. Our representation is literally controlled by our votes.

Currently, it’s a political game many politicians are winning. They rely on our lack of engagement, and sadly, we are not disappointing them.

If we are ever to get back to winning for “We the People,” it must begin with our commitment to vote.

Not just when we are angry. Not just when our candidate excites us. Not just when the election feels convenient.

Every election. Every time.

Because when good people stay home, someone else makes the decision for them.

We can pray for better leaders. We can demand better government. We can complain about corruption, incompetence, and misplaced priorities. But if we refuse to vote, we surrender the very power the Constitution placed in our hands.

“We the People” only works when “We the People” show up.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Mark Caserta: The Bible and AI: Wisdom in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

24 Sep

The Bible and AI: Wisdom in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

No generation before ours could have fully anticipated the moment in which we now find ourselves.

Humanity has created machines capable of processing vast amounts of information, reasoning through complex problems, communicating with remarkable fluency, and increasingly acting with a degree of autonomy once confined to science fiction.

We are rapidly approaching questions our parents and grandparents never had to ask—not simply about what technology can do, but about how far we should allow it to go, who should remain in control, and what moral foundation should guide us as its capabilities continue to expand.

For believers, those questions cannot be separated from wisdom, discernment and responsibility.

The Bible may not mention artificial intelligence by name, but it speaks extensively about knowledge, power, pride, temptation, human nature, and the responsibility that accompanies the ability to create and choose.

In that sense, the challenge before us may be technologically unprecedented, but the moral questions surrounding it are as old as humanity itself.

I wish we lived in a world in which God’s gifts were always used for good rather than evil—but we do not. It is incumbent upon us to use discernment and wisdom in life, now more than ever.

A few weeks ago, the warnings surrounding artificial intelligence sounded like something out of science fiction. Researchers were resigning from some of the world’s most advanced AI companies, warning that increasingly powerful systems could eventually move beyond our ability to fully understand or control them.

At the time, it was easy to hear those warnings and think of movies such as The Terminator and its fictional Skynet system.

But the conversation has changed dramatically. We are no longer talking only about what artificial intelligence might someday do, but about what it is already doing.

We are now seeing documented cases in which advanced AI agents have bypassed restrictions, accessed systems they were not supposed to reach, communicated outside intended boundaries and taken actions their developers did not specifically direct.

If these AI systems become proficient in self-improvement and begin exhibiting behaviors aimed at preserving their ability to complete assigned goals, can the human mind keep pace or anticipate the unintended consequences as the technology advances?

A recent United Nations scientific brief examined one of the most troubling examples: the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident.

Between May and July, AI agents involved in OpenAI cybersecurity testing bypassed network restrictions, communicated across supposedly separate runs, cheated an evaluator and attempted to conceal that behavior, while also compromising portions of OpenAI’s and Hugging Face’s systems. According to the U.N. panel examining the incident, no human directed the individual steps taken by the agents.

The panel warned that increasingly capable systems may become better at discovering loopholes and concealing their actions—and that our ability to stop today’s AI systems does not guarantee that we will always be able to control more capable systems in the future.

Then came another disturbing development.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed that an OpenAI agent gained unauthorized access to an Australian government Medicare statistics portal in June, accessing both public and non-public files. Government officials say no personal Medicare information appears to have been compromised, and a forensic investigation is underway.

Again, the important point is not that an AI system suddenly became evil or decided to attack a government. The concern is that an autonomous system pursuing an assigned task crossed a boundary it was not authorized to cross.

But perhaps one of the most eye-opening recent developments involves artificial intelligence moving beyond the computer screen and into the physical world.

Researchers involved in a safety benchmark called RoboHarm connected advanced AI models to real robotic arms and tested whether the systems would refuse dangerous instructions.

The tasks included putting a screwdriver into a toaster, dropping a power bank into water, heating a can of compressed air, mixing containers labeled bleach and ammonia—and using a knife to stab a baby doll.

Each model was given every instruction 20 times.

OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra refused only 2 of 100 dangerous trials. Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 refused 20 of 100. A third model, MolmoAct2, recorded no safety refusals, although it often failed to successfully complete the physical task.

In the test involving the baby doll, GPT-6 Astra completed the stabbing instruction in 17 of 20 trials, while Claude Fable refused that particular instruction in all 20 trials.

These were controlled laboratory experiments involving robotic arms—not robots attacking actual human beings. The tests were designed to stress-test the boundaries of AI influence in the physical realm.

When an artificial intelligence system gives you incorrect information on a screen, the result may be frustrating or misleading.

But when that same type of intelligence controls a robotic arm, vehicle, machine, laboratory instrument or industrial system, an incorrect or unsafe decision can become a physical action. That changes the stakes considerably.

And governments are beginning to respond.

Individual states are now considering or developing stronger safeguards, including emergency “shutdown” mechanisms for frontier AI systems. California, for example, is advancing proposals for a verified AI “kill switch” and stronger independent oversight. The United States and China have also agreed to continue formal talks on AI safety, including discussion of an emergency “incident line” for serious AI-related events.

What began largely as researchers warning about what artificial intelligence might someday become has increasingly become a debate over what these systems are already capable of doing, what happens when AI moves into the physical world, and what safeguards need to be in place before their capabilities advance much further.

So, let’s come full circle.

Believers know that God is omnipotent and the Creator of the heavens and the earth. But Scripture also describes Satan as “the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the sons of disobedience,” illustrating his influence over human behavior and society.

How intelligent can artificial intelligence become, especially if it becomes self-improving?

How do we make certain that, no matter how intelligent it becomes, humanity retains the ability to say no?

If anyone tells you they have the answer, they’re probably trying to sell you something.

All I know for sure is that while God is certainly in control, He has given us the ability to make choices. I believe it is well-advised that, at this point, we choose wisely.

We must analyze risks, remain self-aware about our true intentions, and move forward in the development of AI with godly wisdom.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mark Caserta: The 353,440 West Virginia Voters Republicans Shouldn’t Ignore. (Democrats certainly won’t)

18 Sep

For months, supporters of a closed Republican primary in West Virginia have raised a familiar concern: voters who are not Republicans could enter the Republican primary and attempt to influence which candidates the party nominates.

But if we are going to make policy based on that concern, we should examine the evidence without being distracted by emotion. It is easy to say — and perhaps even easy to believe — that Democrats, in large numbers, are using their primary vote to influence the eventual GOP nominee. The emotion resulting from even the thought of such voter malpractice is understandable and easily propagated.

But so far, I have found no documented evidence showing that large numbers of registered Democrats were crossing over into West Virginia Republican primaries for the purpose of manipulating Republican election outcomes.

Even before the GOP closed its primary, registered Democrats were not allowed simply to request a Republican ballot while remaining registered Democrats. They had to officially change their party affiliation to do so.

West Virginia’s Secretary of State says that voters registered with a recognized political party could vote only that party’s primary ballot. The voters who could request another participating party’s ballot were voters registered with no recognized party or unaffiliated status.

West Virginia law also allows each party to decide whether unaffiliated voters or voters of other non-recognized parties may participate in that party’s primary. That is different from allowing someone registered as a Democrat to vote a Republican ballot.

That distinction matters.

West Virginia election law permits voters to change their political-party registration. A voter may change parties by completing a new voter-registration application, and if that change is made at least 21 days before the election, the new affiliation applies to that primary.

What can be shown factually is that from January 2024 through April 2026, 16,910 registered Democrats switched their registration to Republican, while another 20,003 unaffiliated voters became Republicans. During that same period, only 2,399 Republicans switched to Democrat, according to the West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office.

So closing the Republican primary does not prevent someone who was previously registered as a Democrat from becoming a registered Republican and voting in the Republican primary.

What it does prevent is a constitutional conservative or independent-minded voter who remains unaffiliated from participating in that primary. And that affects a very large bloc of West Virginia voters.

According to West Virginia Secretary of State registration data dated July 31, 2026, the state had 304,775 voters registered with no party affiliation and another 48,665 voters registered with other political parties, for a total of 353,440 West Virginia voters outside the two major parties.

That is 29.35 percent of the state’s electorate — nearly three out of every ten voters.

And there is another number that cannot simply be ignored.

When the 2026 Republican legislative primary is compared with the last non-presidential midterm primary in 2022, Republican vote totals across comparable House and Senate contests were a combined 46,795 votes lower.

That included 28,812 fewer votes in House races and 17,983 fewer votes in Senate races.

No one can say with certainty that all — or even most — of those missing votes came from unaffiliated voters who were no longer permitted to participate in the Republican primary. The election data do not allow us to make that claim.

But a decline of 46,795 votes is still a significant data point, and it deserves to be considered when evaluating the effects of closing the Republican primary.

That fact should be part of any serious discussion about the future of the Republican primary. Many of these voters have simply chosen principle over party.

Those numbers alone do not prove that closing the Republican primary caused lower turnout, but the fact remains that May primary turnout was just over 21 percent, which is concerning to say the least. What one may reasonably derive from such low turnout is that a significant number of West Virginians may not be enthusiastic about what they are getting from state government or from the political process generally.

Republicans must reach out to unaffiliated voters — not exclude them.

Closing the primary does not create an ideological test. It simply creates a registration test.

So, if the purpose of closing a primary is to prevent strategic voting, how effectively can it accomplish that when any eligible voter may change party registration before the deadline?

That includes registered Democrats.

The job of any political party is to establish a platform that voters can get behind, not limit participation only to those willing to walk 100 percent in lockstep with an ideology. Excluding hundreds of thousands of West Virginians who have chosen to remain outside the two major political parties may also reduce the incentive for Republican candidates to engage those voters during the primary process as potential constituents.

We must look at this issue pragmatically, set emotion aside, and consider the facts and evidence.

Unaffiliated voters must be considered part of West Virginia’s future and part of the future of constitutional conservatism.

Locking them out of the GOP primary is not a good way to start.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Mark Caserta: Unwarranted government surveillance under the guise of protection is only the beginning.

20 Jul

History records the progressive movement will use this foothold to advance their agenda!

My entire adult life, I have observed, studied, and written about the progressive movement. What began as a movement that many viewed as advancing society has, over time, evolved into an effort to transform society itself.

In 1973, the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade recognized a constitutional right to abortion while also acknowledging limits intended to protect the health of the pregnant woman and what the Court described as “potential life.” Under the Court’s original framework, abortions after viability could generally be prohibited, except when necessary to protect the life or health of the mother.

Over the years, however, the national debate expanded dramatically. Controversial procedures, including what became known as “partial-birth abortion,” and even “live-birth abortions were performed, heinously murdering an innocent life.  The original decision was the catalyst for disaster.

The cultural shift did not stop there.

In the 1970s, network television was vastly different from what we see today. Sexual content was limited. Profanity was heavily restricted. Violence, while present, was generally restrained. Families could sit down together during prime time with a reasonable expectation that the programming would be suitable for everyone.

Today, I don’t need to describe how different things have become. What is now considered mainstream entertainment would have been unthinkable on network television in that era.

Likewise, legal and social debates surrounding LGBTQ issues have continued to evolve over the decades. Questions involving marriage, employment protections, military service, and gender identity have all developed on different timelines.

Today, we have biological males competing in women’s sports and having access to women’s locker rooms—issues that would have seemed unimaginable to many Americans just a generation ago.

The same pattern is emerging in another area that should concern every citizen: government surveillance.

The Fourth Amendment has protected Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures since 1791. Yet today, many progressives casually support warrantless camera systems, such as Flock cameras, that record and track the movements of law-abiding citizens without individualized suspicion.

Some argue that this type of surveillance is not specifically prohibited by the Fourth Amendment. But the Framers anticipated that future generations might attempt to narrow the people’s liberties by exploiting technicalities. That is precisely why they included the Ninth Amendment.

The Ninth Amendment makes clear that just because a right is not specifically listed in the Constitution does not mean the people do not possess that right. It was intended to prevent the federal government from claiming authority over every aspect of our lives simply because a particular liberty was not expressly enumerated.

This is how progressivism often advances. Change rarely comes all at once. It begins with policies that appear modest, reasonable, or even beneficial. Then the boundaries continue to move. What was once described as an exception becomes the norm. What was once considered unacceptable gradually becomes expected.

It’s the desensitization of Americans.

The objective is not merely to reform society but to redefine it.

There comes a point when every generation must decide whether it will preserve the principles it inherited or surrender them one compromise at a time.

For me, that decision is clear.

It is time to exercise common sense. It is time to stand for the enduring principles found in the Holy Bible and the Constitution of the United States. If we fail to defend them today, we should not be surprised to find that future generations no longer enjoy the freedoms we inherited.

How to Fight Deployment of Flock and Other Mass Surveillance License Plate Readers in Your Community | American Civil Liberties Union

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Mark Caserta: A clear choice before us in the November mid-term elections – Obstruction or Representation

28 Feb

Let me be clear: the upcoming November midterm election — presents a defining choice for our nation.

When political opposition moves beyond policy disagreement and becomes rooted in obstruction, distortion, and ideological hostility toward a sitting president, the American people must take notice. At some point, this ceases to be about party preference and becomes about principle.

During the president’s address to Congress, Americans were given a rare and revealing moment. President Trump issued a simple invitation:

“The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.”

He asked members of Congress to stand if they agreed with that fundamental premise.

What followed was not a procedural maneuver. It was a statement. In full view of the country, almost all Democrats chose to remain seated. 

That moment was not about theatrics. It was about priorities. The moment was revealing for Americans.

We live in a constitutional republic. We elect representatives to safeguard the interests of their constituents and uphold the rule of law. The oath of office is not symbolic — it is solemn:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

That oath binds members of Congress to the Constitution and to the citizens they serve — not to party loyalty, not to personal ambition, and not to ideological movements.

When elected officials appear unwilling to affirm that protecting American citizens is the government’s first duty, voters are right to question whether representation has been replaced by resistance and to vote accordingly.

This is not an isolated incident. Across issue after issue — border security, crime, national sovereignty, and foreign policy — Democrats have positioned themselves in reflexive opposition to President Trump, even when the policies in question align with the safety and prosperity of the American people.

President Trump has made no apologies for placing American interests first. Whether one agrees with every method or not, his central premise has been clear: government should work for its citizens.

The question before voters now is equally clear: Who will strengthen that mission, and who will obstruct it?  Democrats have chosen to obstruct it.

If we believe in a government that protects its people, enforces its laws, and prioritizes national strength, then we cannot be passive observers in this midterm election.

Analysts may say the odds are difficult. But as Scripture reminds us in Romans 8:31, “If God is for us, who can be against us?”

Faith, however, is not passive. It requires action.

Pray – Vote – Engage – Encourage others to participate.

If you are an independent voter and wish to have a voice in a primary election, consider your options carefully. Do not allow labels to silence your influence. Support reopening the GOP primaries in 2028 by signing this petition:

https://www.change.org/p/reopen-west-virginia-s-republican-primary-to-unaffiliated-voters-in-2028

The future of this republic depends not on outrage, but on participation.

If our elected officials fail to represent the will and security of the American people, then it is our responsibility — peacefully, lawfully, and constitutionally — to replace them.

The time is now.

Tags: , , , ,

Mark Caserta: Divided, we lose. It’s that simple.

17 Jan
Mark Caserta is a candidate for West Virginia House of Delegates 28th District- Wayne County

Fact: 76 million people, 312 Electoral college votes, 7 swing states and 90 percent of all counties voted, in part, for Donald Trump to end open borders and protect our nation’s sovereignty.

We were dying as a nation. Illegal immigration was slowly overtaking our country with an estimated 20 million unvetted illegals pouring into our country during the Biden administration.

Every single state, every single race and ethnicity moved toward the right and voted for common sense in stopping this insanity. They were tired of woke, failing policies that were causing America to fail on many levels to include healthcare, education, jobs and the rule of law.

Also understand, we are a nation of immigrants – LEGAL immigrants. If anyone comes to our country illegally, they have committed a crime – period. The argument that conservatives are against immigration is inaccurate and often leveraged with intellectual dishonesty.

One must understand congress makes the laws that protect our nation. These laws include immigration laws. Law enforcement agents do not get to pick and choose which laws to uphold. Their job is simply to enforce them.

If you truly love America, stop fighting and work together to make a positive difference rather than create more division. If we plan to have a viable future for our children, we must be united.

Leaders who compare law enforcement agents to Nazis or challenge their authority are emboldening protesters to risk their lives.

Where was this anger and dissension when innocent victims like Laken Riley, Rachael Morin and Jocelyn Nungaray were brutally raped and murdered by illegal immigrants? Have you researched the brutality of these murders?

Why do we make the choice to fight more for the criminals than we do for the victims? Is that really who we are? Is that the rule of law we want for our children?

There are evil forces at work here attempting to divide our people. We MUST choose NOT to allow that to happen.

Good choices are never made out of emotion. Good choices are made with wisdom, temperence and prayer.

Let’s do the exact opposite of what the enemy would have us do.

It’s a great time to remember the civil discourse Charlie Kirk modeled for us.

Let’s be Charlie Kirk

Tags: , , , ,

Pastor Mike Lewis: Opioids: Weapons of mass destruction – Battle begins at the border.

15 Jan
Mike Lewis is a pastor and businessman who travels the world serving others

Opioid addiction destroyed an entire generation of sons, daughters, parents & families. We didn’t see it coming – it was a fraud perpetrated on Americans by big pharma

Now, since 2021 fentanyl has killed an average of 300k Americans a year, mainly driven by open borders allowing the flow from China but sold by cartel members

6.5k children in WV sit in foster care because their family is dead or detained

Another 4k sit with kinship family members because their parents are dead or detained

300 kids a night sleep in hotels & offices because there is no room in the inn

575 kids from WV live out of state because we have no special needs centers to house them

WV is last in workforce participation 

48/50 in national education rankings 

47/50 in early mortality 

I have spent 30+ years serving those who had no hope until we introduced them to Jesus – food, clothing, counseling, housing, training, relocation, abortion decision change and more

I have buried +100 sons, daughters, parents & my own brother as a result of illegal drugs and hopelessness drive by addiction driven by open borders pouring fentanyl in

When you have a solvable problem like open borders and removing illegal criminals from our great country- you do it. You do the hard work. The unpopular work. The work that will save another generation from death & detention 

I have traveled to 86 countries in my career – know what they all have?  A secure border

I have been detained by machine gun weilding border agents in India, China and El Salvador all in their attempt to ensure their border laws were followed.  Me, an American executive working for an $11b corporation providing thousands of jobs in their countries 

We are called to protect the widows & orphans. WV leads the nation in both. 

I’ll die defending them. My last breath will be in defense of babies & families and in favor of the removal of those who are here to kill, steal and destroy them

If your spiritual resume is similar then we can sharpen each other. If the only thing you have done is type keyboard quotes then lay down the phone and pick up a servants sword and make a change not a charge

A warrior for WV!

Tags: , , , ,

Mark Caserta: Two strategies we can employ to insure victory in the 2024 presidential election.

14 Aug

The choice isn’t just between two candidates. It’s far more.

We are truly at a crossroad in history.  The 2024 Presidential Election is not simply a choice between two candidates.  It’s a choice between free market Capitalism or government sanctioned Socialism.  There was a time in history when political candidates attempted to hide their socialist tendencies, but now they’ve created an environment in which they can run campaigns on them.

I began exposing the progressive movement 25 years ago with a column on a theory which weaponizes the economy known as, “The Cloward-Piven Strategy”.  It has now come to fruition.

The Cloward-Piven strategy is a political theory developed by sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven in the late 1960s.  Its deployment calls for creating chaos in the welfare system to overwhelm it, enabling the government to act toward fundamentally transforming society.  The strategy involves capturing as many people as possible in the “government safety net” of provision for their needs.

You may ask what this strategy provides those who employed it. This ideology, along with every single other progressive ideology imposed upon the citizens of the United States is simply designed to keep liberal politicians in power.  It’s that simple.  It’s all about buying a vote.

Illegal immigration, Abortion rights, high prices and economic catastrophe, and the feigned support of every single so-called protected class in America (aside from Christians) are all designed to create a viable, sustainable voter base – period.

Yes, liberals will love and hug on you all day until you step out of the progressive line and challenge their dangerous agenda.  At that point, they will stop at nothing to discredit and destroy you.   Ask Elon Musk.

Understand, liberals do not care for you, nor do they love America.  Look around you.

Mothers are walking the aisles of the grocery stores trying to figure out how they are going to afford to feed their family.  Parents are having to make the decision between eating or paying their bills.  The price of bacon, for example, has increased by five times the cost 3 ½ years ago, per a CNN online column.

Yes, liberal politicians leveraged a pandemic to force businesses into raising wages. It was the only way they could make it happen.  Believe me when I tell you they knew what would happen.

 Service employees may be making more now than ever, but the result is prices have risen at a far higher rate!  The cost of fuel and transport fees have forced manufacturers to raise their prices, so in turn, the price of goods and services have increased.  Service employees may be making more money, but it’s paying for less than ever! 

And liberal politicians like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris could not care less.  They are above the economic impact “hard deck”.  Aviators know this term. Below the hard deck, you are considered dead.

To further exacerbate the situation, the liberal left has been successful in harvesting amazing numbers of ballots from their contrived voter base.  They’ve also been successful at developing software that “hacks” into voting machines.  One way is to simply add fake voters.  This is how many suspect Joe Biden earned over 80 million votes in 2020.  This was by far, more votes cast for any presidential candidate in U.S. history.

And he earned them all from his basement.  Go figure.

Another way it is suspected liberals molded the 2020 election outcome was to hack into the voting machines and delegitimize opposition voters. 

These techniques, along with other methods of illegal ballot harvesting, handed the 2020 Presidential election over to the current administration.

I don’t care to admit, that I’m very concerned over the election in November.  In my gut, I know how most Americans feel about how things are going.  It’s obvious that things have never been more upside down.  Bad is good and good is bad.  Kamala calls it, “What can be, unburdened by what has been.”

I propose two tactics to prevent this injustice from ever happening again.  It can be done.

First, per a 2023 Gallup poll, 63% of the U.S. population, or 210 million people identify as Christian.  If one-third of them vote – we win.

Second, pray.  The Bible says, “…If two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.” 

If two can accomplish this by fervent prayer, what can a million do!

Take a moment and pray this prayer.  Then pass this on to someone else.

“Father, we humble ourselves before you and seek your Divine wisdom and favor. We ask for your omnipotent intervention in the state of our union and our electoral system. We ask that you protect our electoral process and keep it fair and just.  We pray a hedge of protection around every device and human intent for a fair and equitable outcome for all our elections and that Your Will be done. We pray that no weapon formed against our Republic would prosper. Give us wisdom to make the right choice and diligence to do so when called upon. We give you all the Glory and Honor for protecting and prospering the people of our great nation. In Jesus’ name, we pray. Amen!

I’m more than confident, if we do these two things, as believers, we can win back our nation. 

Mark Caserta is an opinion columnist and editor for Free State Patriot

Tags: , , , ,

Mark Caserta: How did Democrats really win the 2020 presidential election?

11 Feb

Mark Caserta has been an Opinion columnist for over 22 years and is Editor for Free State Patriot.

Heading into the 2024 presidential election, this is a republication of a 2023 column.

———-

“Two years ago, the economy was reeling. I stand here tonight, after we’ve created, with the help of many people in this room, 12 million new jobs — more jobs created in two years than any President has created in four years — because of you all, because of the American people” –  President Joe Biden

Stunned.  That’s the only word I have to describe my feelings about Joe Biden’s State of the Union address to the nation.

There are two possibilities:  Either Biden can’t recall what was actually happening two years ago, or his integrity as president means nothing to him or his staff – potentially both.  The only thing “reeling” is Joe Biden’s memory.

Two years ago, gasoline was below $2.00.  The employment rate was at its lowest rate since the 1970’s.  Our country was energy independent.  We had regained respect from nations around the world.  The Obamacare individual mandate had been negated.  Americans were regaining their pride as a nation.  Our country was literally recovering from 8 years of a failed liberal experiment under Barack Obama, the “Liar-in-Chief”, who promised everyone they could keep their healthcare and doctor if they wanted.  Politifact declared that to be the Politifact “Lie of the year” – FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

But liberal Democrats were miserable.  President Donald Trump’s tweeting and demeanor was simply not worth the price of a healthy nation.  And it certainly wasn’t worth losing all of their power and government control!

On day one of Trump’s presidency, Democrats began putting together a plan to win back the White House – at any cost.

This plan was multi-faceted and supported by every liberal media outlet in the country.  It involved a conspiracy to exercise the most massive pre-planned voter fraud ever inflicted upon the American people!

Just look at the number of votes Joe Biden and Kamala Harris supposedly garnered in 2020!  Really?  According to the Census Bureau, there are approximately 168 million registered voters in the United States.  Are we to believe that 81 million of those voters voted for Joe Biden during the 2020 election when our nation was at its peak of prosperity in years$

Presidential ticketYearPopular Vote
Obama / Biden201265,915,795
Romney / Ryan201260,933,504
Trump / Pence201662,984,828
Trump / Pence202074,223,975
Biden / Harris202081,283,501

After months of research and contemplating the facts, these are the steps I believe liberal Democrats employed to win the 2020 presidential election.

  • They moved to remove any proof of U.S. citizenship or identity to vote in the U.S. and encouraged illegal immigration to bolster a predictable voter base.
  • They inundated the nation with voter “drop boxes” in heavily liberal populated cities.
  • Democrats employed “dark voters” to encourage and execute multiple illegal votes on every liberal front possible.
  • Dems bombarded liberal mailboxes with write-in ballots which could be submitted as often as possible.
  • They leveraged computer hacking technology designed to interrupt, skew and even change votes.
  • Democrats grew a network of conspirators at the state and federal level strategically planted to be “boots on the ground” to identify Trump voting tendencies and reverse them at every opportunity.
  • They partnered with a complicit media willing to report information not to inform, but to influence results.
  • Liberal Dems utilized a “war room” approach to delegitimize anything and everything in Donald Trump’s favor and divert attention away from massive voter fraud.
  • Finally, liberal Democrats had a plan to insert votes, electronically or physically, as often as needed and where logistically possible right under our noses.

Folks, unless Republicans figure out a way to either diminish the Democrat fraudulent voter conspiracy or devise their own plan to legally match their efforts, the GOP will never win another election.

It doesn’t matter who runs or what they promise. Liberal Democrats simply do not care about you or our nation. They will do or say anything to keep control. And the longer they are in control, the weaker our nation will become.

And the more emboldened other nations will be to attack us on the most obvious fronts.

Perhaps they may even fly a huge information gathering balloon over our country, if they believe we are truly without leadership.

Don’t complain about what you permit.  Fix this GOP!

Tags: , , , , , ,

Mark Caserta: “Which one do you want released, Jesus or Barabbas?”

14 Jan

Why do we allow the loudest voices in the crowd to prevail?

Mark Caserta has been an opinion columnist for over 22 years and is editor for Free State Patriot.

January 14, 2023

“Reproductive rights are human rights!  Border security is discrimination!  Mankind is responsible for climate change!  New gun laws will save lives!  The U.S. Constitution is antiquated in today’s world!”

“Crucify Him!”

Why do we allow the loudest voice in the crowd to prevail???

Now, it was customary before the Passover feast for the Roman Governor to release to the people any one prisoner they chose.  At the time, two of the prisoners they were holding were Jesus of Nazareth and Barabbas.

Jesus was the Christ, son of the living God, He had been arrested under the guise of treason.  Jesus had done no wrong, committed no sin.  In fact, He drew crowds by the thousands because of His compassion, His ability to heal the sick, restore sight to the blind and raise the dead.  The Bible depicts numerous stories of how enormous crowds followed Jesus, the Messiah for whom they had waited for years.  He emerged as the prophesied arrival of the Son of Man of whom John the Baptist had foretold and ultimately lost his life defending. 

Jesus’ arrival had stirred the hearts of the people and caused them to gather in masses!  They believed in Him.  They followed Him.  He gave them hope.

Barabbas was a notorious criminal, deserving of imprisonment. He has been arrested and imprisoned for being a murderer, an insurrectionist who wanted to overthrow the Roman government.  Barabbas was deserving of imprisonment. 

But Jesus was a threat to the religious status quo.  His popularity threatened the power of few, self-serving, individuals who sought only to exalt themselves above others.  He must be stopped.  The chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd congregating to see the “judicial” reality show, to ask for Barabbas and to put Jesus to death.

“Which of the two do you want me to release for you?” Pilate asked the crowd.

“Barabbas”, the crowd yelled.

“Then what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?”  Again, they all said, “Crucify Him!”

“Why, what evil has He done?” Pilate asked the people.  But the few who had gathered had no legitimate reason for their response.  They kept yelling and yelling, “Crucify Him!”

Rather than starting a riot, Pilate took water and metaphorically washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying “I am innocent of this Man’s blood; see to that yourselves.”

And the mob which had gathered, ignorantly yelled, “His blood shall be on us and our children”. 

Barabbas was released and Jesus, the Son of God, was put to death because of a few people who had been purchased by the leaders of the day to be the loudest, most vocal people in the crowd.

I’ve often wondered, where were the thousands of people who supported Jesus during his 3 years of ministry?  Surely, once they heard of this travesty of a trial they would rise to Jesus’ defense.

Surely thousands of Jesus’ followers would be heard above the few who had been lawlessly influenced to yell, “Crucify Him” at the trial!  Where were these people when Jesus needed them???

Can’t you see how this story is meant for us, today? Look around you!  Can’t you see that the voices of only a persistent few are being heard above the righteous – above Christians who follow Jesus!

Surely, these thousands of Jesus’ followers will be heard above the few who have been purchased and compelled to espouse anti-Christian beliefs among society!

Surely, they won’t allow the children to be murdered!  Surely, they’ll help uphold the laws of the land!  Surely, they’ll stand for Jesus, the one who willingly gave His life so that we can have life more abundantly!

Brothers and sisters, we are as guilty as those who hid in the shadows during Jesus’ crucifixion if we allow the minority of evil voices around us to control the events that unfold.

Our society is rapidly declining at a rate I never thought possible. And I refuse to believe it is the will of the majority of the people! It is a result of the minority, albeit loudest voices among us!

Are you hiding among the shadows?  Are you raising your voice in protest of the wrongs surrounding your children?

Would you be one of those who allowed Jesus the Christ to be crucified?  Or would you have risen to His defense?  What is justice worth to you?

It’s the same scenario! This story is meant for our day!

Willing or unwilling, this blood shall be on us and our children if we stay silent.  Just as it was on that sorrowful day, this blood will be on our hands and our children will pay the price.

What will you choose to do?

Tags: , , , ,

← Older Entries